The Cost of Mass Deportations

Illegal immigration into the US is clearly a major problem. The influx of illegal immigrants has been effectively stopped by vigorous enforcement at the border and no doubt word has spread through Mexico that getting into the US at present is nearly impossible.

 

Nobody seems to have considered the economic effect of deporting the illegal immigrants already in the US.

 

Illegal immigrants are individuals who enter or remain in the United States without proper authorization. The reasons for illegal immigration are varied—ranging from economic opportunity and family reunification to fleeing violence or persecution. The scale of the issue is significant, with estimates suggesting millions living without legal status.

Current estimates of the illegal or unauthorized immigrants currently living in the US range from 9 million to 14 million. The Migration Policy Institute puts the number at 13,738,000. According to the same source, 45% have lived in the US for over 20 years and 9,107,000, over 70% of the over 16 population, are currently employed. 530,000 are unemployed, with the rest not in the workforce.

Those who are gainfully employed are contributing to the economy. Assuming that most are earning at the local minimum wage, which ranges from $7.25 per hour in Texas to $16.90 per hour in California, the average earnings per employee is about $26,000 per year. This estimate takes into account how many immigrants are in each state and what the minimum wage is in that state and that the employment is year round. The contribution to the country’s GDP is not just the earnings of the individuals but also the value of the fruits of that labour plus the multiplying factor as the money earned is circulated through the economy. These factors will at least double the contribution, resulting in each worker contributing $50,000 a year.

9 million workers contributing $50,000 per year is $500 billion annually.  In other words, if all of the illegal immigrants are deported then the GDP of the US will go down by about $500 billion. To this cost we must add the budget of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) budget which currently stands at $28-29 billion annually.

Even in an economy as large as the US (2025 GDP $30.5 trillion) such a loss will be significant. Deporting all illegal immigrants is clearly not an effective technique to “Make America Great Again”.

 

The answer has to be to be selective in who is deported and who is awarded Americans US citizenship or provided with a route towards US citizenship or simply permission to stay and work in the US without citizenship.

 

Selecting which immigrants to be allowed to stay is complex. Some situations, such as someone who has been in the US for a certain time (perhaps 10 years) is working, is paying taxes (hence contributing to the economy) and has no criminal record should clearly be fast tracked towards citizenship. Similarly the so-called “dreamers” who were brought into the US illegally by their parents when they were underage and have lived all their lives in the US should also be fast tracked for citizenship. Illegal immigrants who have a criminal record or are in jail or belong to a criminal organization should be deported as quickly as possible. In between these extremes the issue becomes much more difficult. A point system could be devised and based on that illegal residents could be classed in one of several categories with different treatment.

 

Of course, those being given US citizenship would have to be given a presidential pardon. For some, this would be tantamount to “rewarding crime”. However, illegal immigration is a victimless crime.  If the January 6th insurgents could be given a pardon, then surely a peaceful group like the immigrants, who are contributing to the US, can also be pardoned.

 

A more worrying development could be a “moral hazard”. These actions could be perceived as an invitation – if you can sneak into the US and stay clean for 10 years, you get citizenship automatically. However with the border effectively closed and employers made responsible that their employees are legal residents, the recurrence of such immigration can be controlled.

The EU after Brexit – A Vision for Success

Much has been written about the effects of Brexit on the UK, but there has been little thought given to the future of the EU itself.

The problems of the EU are well known. What Europe needs is a Julius Caesar, Charlemagne, Napoleon or a Bismark (or all of them). Angela Merkel showed hints of European leadership, until her disastrous error in allowing unlimited numbers of “refugees” into Germany. Even though there is the lack of leadership, clear common goals and periodic crises, the EU muddles through, in spite of the British press gleefully predicting the imminent break-up of the EU and the collapse of the Euro

Continue reading “The EU after Brexit – A Vision for Success”

Trump’s Achievements

No president has divided public opinion more than Donald Trump. Many find him personally obnoxious, irresponsible and harmful to the U.S. and the world. His supporters however, see him as a breath of fresh air who is “making America great again”.

Personally, I am not an admirer of Trump but I think that it is beneficial to play the “devil’s advocate” and try to look at his record in his first two years in as positive light as possible. Continue reading “Trump’s Achievements”

Canadian Values – The Limits to Multi-Culturalism

Multi-culturalism is an official policy of the Canadian Government. From an early age, children are taught that Canada is a multi-cultural country and it is contrasted to the U.S., where the policy is of a “melting-pot”.

Multi-culturalism is based on the assumption that all cultures are equal and should be treated equally. All cultures share the same basis values, so can live together peacefully. However, the rise of radical Islam puts this assumption to the test. Even the most ardent multi-culturalist, Angela Merkel, has said “multi-culturalism does not work”.

Recently, it was proposed that immigrants to Canada should espouse “Canadian Values”, either as a course on entry or as part of the immigration process. The idea fell through when nobody could define “Canadian Values”.

However, it is much easier to list what does not fit with “Canadian Values”. Continue reading “Canadian Values – The Limits to Multi-Culturalism”

The Hypocrisy of Angela Merkel

The chief reason the British voted to leave the EU was the issue of immigration. Before the vote, David Cameron (Britain’s Prime Minister) “re-negotiated” the relationship of Britain with the rest of the EU. However, he was unable to get any concessions on EU immigration because it is one of the “four freedoms” which is central to the EU.

Could there be a conspiracy at work?

Continue reading “The Hypocrisy of Angela Merkel”