A Possible Solution for Peace in Ukraine

The latest peace talks in Ukraine collapsed after two hours. The discussion currently focuses on the part of western Donetsk which is currently under Ukrainian control. Russia insists on annexing the area. Some ideas to make this more palatable for the Ukrainians include making the area a demilitarized zone (with the security provided by Russian police and border guards) or a “free trade area” (whatever that means).

These proposals are unacceptable to Ukraine. Zelensky rightly complains that Trump is pushing for Ukraine to make concessions but demands no concessions from Russia.

A concept that has not been raised is the idea of swapping western Donetsk for some of the territory in Zaporizhzia and Kherson oblasts currently under Russian occupation.

This would allow Putin to claim that he has liberated western Donetsk and protected the Russian speakers in that area from the oppression by the “Nazi Kyiv regime”.  At the same time, Ukraine regaining territory in the south could be acceptable to the Ukrainian government and its people.

How much land would be returned to Ukraine is obviously a question of negotiation. Ideally the whole of the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia oblasts currently under occupation should be a starting point. Negotiations on the area could involve issues like equal pre-war populations or equal pre-war economic output. Another issue would be land access between Russia and Crimea – this could be achieved through a rail and road corridor from Russia to Crimea, similar to the connection between Russia and Kaliningrad in the north.

The other major issue in the peace negotiations is the question of security guarantees for Ukraine. There appears to have been some agreement on this, though Russia insists that there should be no NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine. This can be circumvented by having EU troops rather than NATO troops in Ukraine, with a preference for troops from the West of EU such as Spain, Portugal  or Italy and no military presence from East Russia (AKA United States of America).

Scary Russian Influence in the Trump Administration

Scary Russian Influence in the Trump Administration

The London Sunday Times published a story “Vladimir Putin’s sway over the US is even worse than you think”. Written by Dominic Lawson, who writes columns for The Sunday Times and the Daily Mail. I.e. he is not a noisy Radio talk-show host spreading populist conspiracy theories, mis-information and dis-information.

I think his article needs wider readership. I have extracted some elements from the article here, with some edits for brevity, (the extracts are printed in itallics). The full article can be found here:

https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/vladimir-putins-sway-over-the-us-is-even-worse-than-you-think-c9ck3sst5

About Tulsi Gabbard

Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard posted in the aftermath of the Oval Office fracas between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelensky in February.   She Posted: “Zelensky has been trying to drag the United States into a nuclear war with Russia/WW3 for years now”.

When Trump nominated her as director of intelligence, Rossiya-1, the main state TV channel, claimed her as a “comrade”.

But who put the idea in Trump’s mind that she was the woman for the top intelligence job? The name mentioned is George O’Neill Jr. He had promoted Gabbard for many years.

O’Neill had a personal Russian connection. This was Maria Butina, now a member of Putin’s party in the Duma, who lived in Washington until she was convicted in 2018 of being an unregistered agent of the Kremlin. One of her close contacts …  was revealed by The Wall Street Journal to be O’Neill, described by the paper as “an outspoken advocate of closer ties with Russia”.

About Darren Beattie

… the acting undersecretary for public diplomacy, Darren Beattie (who married a Russian woman in 2021). Beattie has been intimately involved in the shutting-down of the State Department’s counter foreign information manipulation and interference hub, known as R/Fimi. Russian disinformation was at the heart of R/Fimi’s work, but Beattie told staff that the operation was “severely misaligned” with the Trump administration’s policies. Which is certainly true.

Beattie set up a news operation of his own which was determinedly pro-Kremlin. Two months before Putin launched his “SMO”, Beattie wrote: “Imagine the whining from the Globalist American Empire if Putin ‘invades’ Ukraine … I love it when our national security bureaucrats fail!”

Donald Trump

Where the parts on Tulsi Gabbard and Darren Beattie are largely factual, when it comes to Donald Trump, Lawson is much more interpretative.

Trump, though, is much more motivated by personal greed and perceived slights. He has never forgiven Zelensky for refusing to assist him against Hunter Biden.  And Trump has wanted his family’s hotel business to have a foothold in Moscow. Moreover, Russian money kept the Trump Organisation solvent when US and European banks were no longer prepared to lend.

Greta Thunberg was Wrong about Economic Growth

In a speech, Greta Thunberg stated: “all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth”. Continue reading “Greta Thunberg was Wrong about Economic Growth”

What is 1 + 1? It depends who you ask!

Donald Trump

By Shealah Craighead - White House, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=63768460
Official portrait of President Donald J. Trump, Friday, By Shealah Craighead – White House, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=63768460

“Glad you asked me this question. I am a very stable genius and math is one of my specialties. When I was on the Howard Stern show, he asked me a very difficult math question, “What is 17 times 6?”.

 

Continue reading “What is 1 + 1? It depends who you ask!”

The EU after Brexit – A Vision for Success

Much has been written about the effects of Brexit on the UK, but there has been little thought given to the future of the EU itself.

The problems of the EU are well known. What Europe needs is a Julius Caesar, Charlemagne, Napoleon or a Bismark (or all of them). Angela Merkel showed hints of European leadership, until her disastrous error in allowing unlimited numbers of “refugees” into Germany. Even though there is the lack of leadership, clear common goals and periodic crises, the EU muddles through, in spite of the British press gleefully predicting the imminent break-up of the EU and the collapse of the Euro

Continue reading “The EU after Brexit – A Vision for Success”